PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BP.L vs. HSBA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BP plc (BP.L) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BP.L achieves a 29.24% return, which is significantly higher than HSBA.L's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BP.L has underperformed HSBA.L with an annualized return of 10.09%, while HSBA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


BP.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.99%
YTD
29.24%
6M
24.19%
1Y
59.22%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
10.09%

HSBA.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.48%
YTD
20.63%
6M
33.00%
1Y
62.97%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
33.67%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BP.L
BP plc
29.24%16.65%-11.03%2.65%50.71%36.34%-41.69%1.09%0.45%9.53%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
20.63%57.77%36.43%32.14%19.91%22.90%-35.99%-2.41%-11.05%23.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BP.L and HSBA.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.42

The correlation between BP.L and HSBA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BP.L:

£85.45B

HSBA.L:

£237.12B

EPS

BP.L:

£0.20

HSBA.L:

£1.27

PE Ratio

BP.L:

27.29

HSBA.L:

10.80

PEG Ratio

BP.L:

2.44

HSBA.L:

0.52

PS Ratio

BP.L:

0.44

HSBA.L:

1.91

PB Ratio

BP.L:

1.53

HSBA.L:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

BP.L:

£193.54B

HSBA.L:

£125.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BP.L:

£42.27B

HSBA.L:

£61.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

BP.L:

£35.50B

HSBA.L:

£31.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BP.L vs. HSBA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BP.L
BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP plc (BP.L) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BP.LHSBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

3.93

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

14.65

-3.02

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BP.L and HSBA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BP.LHSBA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.49

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.37

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.73

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.22

-0.06

Drawdowns

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, roughly equal to the maximum HSBA.L drawdown of -66.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP.L and HSBA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BP.LHSBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-66.05%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-15.96%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

-21.98%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-21.98%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.14%

-59.96%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-2.74%

-6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-18.74%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

4.27%

+0.81%

Volatility

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Volatility Comparison

BP plc (BP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) at 5.97%. This indicates that BP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSBA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BP.LHSBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

5.97%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

20.94%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.49%

25.25%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.62%

24.59%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

24.77%

+5.88%

Dividends

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Dividend Comparison

BP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than HSBA.L's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BP.L
BP plc
4.57%5.68%6.04%4.79%4.32%4.70%9.60%6.78%6.16%5.93%5.77%7.45%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.06%4.28%8.28%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BP plc and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
51.14B
31.56B
(BP.L) Total Revenue
(HSBA.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

BP.L vs. HSBA.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BP plc and HSBC Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
24.1%
50.4%
Portfolio components
BP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported a gross profit of 12.32B and revenue of 51.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

HSBA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 15.89B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.

BP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported an operating income of 9.02B and revenue of 51.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

HSBA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.18B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

BP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported a net income of 3.76B and revenue of 51.14B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

HSBA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.19B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BP.L and HSBA.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BP.L and HSBA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer