PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BP.L vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BP plc (BP.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BP.L achieves a 29.24% return, which is significantly higher than BATS.L's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BP.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 10.09%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


BP.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.99%
YTD
29.24%
6M
24.19%
1Y
59.22%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
10.09%

BATS.L

1D
1.48%
1M
4.73%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.51%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BP.L
BP plc
29.24%16.65%-11.03%2.65%50.71%36.34%-41.69%1.09%0.45%9.53%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
7.56%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-47.15%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BP.L and BATS.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between BP.L and BATS.L has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BP.L:

£85.45B

BATS.L:

£97.89B

EPS

BP.L:

£0.20

BATS.L:

£4.91

PE Ratio

BP.L:

27.29

BATS.L:

9.10

PEG Ratio

BP.L:

2.44

BATS.L:

0.34

PS Ratio

BP.L:

0.44

BATS.L:

1.91

PB Ratio

BP.L:

1.53

BATS.L:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

BP.L:

£193.54B

BATS.L:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BP.L:

£42.27B

BATS.L:

£35.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

BP.L:

£35.50B

BATS.L:

£17.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BP.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BP.L
BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP plc (BP.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BP.LBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.54

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

6.13

+5.50

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BP.L and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BP.LBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.53

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.90

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.31

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.41

-0.24

Drawdowns

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP.L and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BP.LBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-54.44%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-13.70%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

-14.78%

-20.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-29.68%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.14%

-54.44%

-8.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-9.94%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-15.17%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

5.69%

-0.61%

Volatility

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BP plc (BP.L) is 7.77%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that BP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BP.LBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

10.04%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

18.26%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.49%

22.75%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.62%

20.57%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

23.92%

+6.73%

Dividends

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

BP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%
BP.L
BP plc
4.57%5.68%6.04%4.79%4.32%4.70%9.60%6.78%6.16%5.93%5.77%7.45%

Financials

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BP plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
51.14B
13.54B
(BP.L) Total Revenue
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

BP.L vs. BATS.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BP plc and British American Tobacco plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
24.1%
61.1%
Portfolio components
BP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported a gross profit of 12.32B and revenue of 51.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

BATS.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

BP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported an operating income of 9.02B and revenue of 51.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

BATS.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

BP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BP plc reported a net income of 3.76B and revenue of 51.14B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

BATS.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BP.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BP.L and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer