BOXX vs. IEFA
BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOXX returned 4.72%/yr vs 16.13%/yr for IEFA. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. BOXX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
BOXX vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 7.49% return.
BOXX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
BOXX vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 1.60% | 4.37% | 5.16% | 5.04% | 0.07% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOXX and IEFA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022 | -0.00 |
BOXX vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOXX
IEFA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BOXX
IEFA
Financial Services
BOXX
IEFA
Communication Services
BOXX
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
BOXX
IEFA
Healthcare
BOXX
IEFA
Industrials
BOXX
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
BOXX
IEFA
Energy
BOXX
IEFA
Utilities
BOXX
IEFA
Real Estate
BOXX
IEFA
Basic Materials
BOXX
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOXX vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
BOXX
IEFA
BOXX vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOXX | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +35.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.69 | 1.24 | +8.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.95 | 1.71 | +57.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 524.63 | 6.52 | +518.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOXX | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68 | 1.30 | +11.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.89 | 0.50 | +12.39 |
Drawdowns
BOXX vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOXX | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -34.78% | +34.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | -11.50% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.12% | -13.76% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.44% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -6.69% | +6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 3.02% | -3.01% |
Volatility
BOXX vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.09%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOXX | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 4.54% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.25% | 12.74% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 15.22% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 16.55% | -16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 17.32% | -16.95% |
BOXX vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BOXX vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOXX and IEFA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 3-year performance, IEFA leads with 16.13% vs 4.72% for BOXX. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.
BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.07% for IEFA.
BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.68 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOXX and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer