BOND vs. BKLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) and BKLN (Invesco Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while BKLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. BOND is actively managed, while BKLN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BOND returned 2.08%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for BKLN. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOND charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKLN.

Performance

BOND vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOND achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BOND has underperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 2.08%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.25% annualized return.

BOND

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: -0.03%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 2.08%

BKLN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 5.09%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOND vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF	-0.03%	8.39%	2.77%	6.48%	-14.57%	-0.77%	7.80%	8.54%	0.08%	4.76%
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF	-0.04%	6.88%	8.21%	12.53%	-2.51%	2.32%	1.32%	10.03%	-1.32%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BOND and BKLN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.04

The correlation between BOND and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOND vs. BKLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOND	BKLN
Financial Services	100.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.7%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Industrials	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	5.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BOND vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOND

BOND Risk / Return Rank: 49
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BKLN

BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 50
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOND vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOND	BKLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.61	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.37	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.44	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.47	5.65	+0.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOND vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOND Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOND and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOND	BKLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.61	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	1.14	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.66	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.64	-0.02

Drawdowns

BOND vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOND drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND and BKLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOND	BKLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.71%	-24.17%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-3.07%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.12%	-3.55%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	-7.31%	-12.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.71%	-24.17%	+4.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-0.48%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-1.09%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.78%	+0.18%

Volatility

BOND vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that BOND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOND	BKLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	0.44%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.93%	2.52%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	2.75%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.77%	4.48%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	6.43%	-1.34%

BOND vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOND has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOND vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

BOND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than BKLN's 6.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF	6.63%	6.95%	8.41%	8.59%	4.93%	3.11%	3.56%	4.86%	4.52%	3.50%	4.54%	4.12%
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF	5.21%	5.11%	5.02%	4.06%	3.44%	2.58%	2.66%	3.38%	3.18%	2.87%	2.85%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOND and BKLN in my portfolio?

BOND and BKLN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOND or BKLN?

BOND has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOND dropped -19.71% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

Which ETF is better, BOND or BKLN?

On 10-year performance, BKLN leads with 4.25% vs 2.08% for BOND. On fees, BOND is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOND or BKLN?

Over the 10-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 4.25% return vs 2.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOND or BKLN?

BOND is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOND or BKLN?

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 5.21% for BOND.

What is the main difference between BOND and BKLN?

BOND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BOND and 0.65% for BKLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.