BNZL.L vs. WPP
BNZL.L (Bunzl plc) and WPP (WPP plc) are both stocks. BNZL.L operates in Food Distribution (Consumer Defensive), while WPP operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, BNZL.L returned 3.94%/yr vs -12.04%/yr for WPP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BNZL.L is traded in GBp, while WPP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WPP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNZL.L achieves a 22.86% return, which is significantly higher than WPP's -19.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BNZL.L has outperformed WPP with an annualized return of 3.94%, while WPP has yielded a comparatively lower -12.04% annualized return.
BNZL.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 6M
- 19.63%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- -4.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
WPP
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- -19.30%
- 6M
- -9.76%
- 1Y
- -50.78%
- 3Y*
- -29.18%
- 5Y*
- -19.55%
- 10Y*
- -12.04%
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between BNZL.L and WPP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007 | 0.33 |
The correlation between BNZL.L and WPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BNZL.L:
£8.13B
WPP:
$3.75B
BNZL.L:
£2.93
WPP:
$1.51
BNZL.L:
8.50
WPP:
11.58
BNZL.L:
4.95
WPP:
0.15
BNZL.L:
0.35
WPP:
0.13
BNZL.L:
2.92
WPP:
1.48
BNZL.L:
£23.62B
WPP:
$28.29B
BNZL.L:
£3.39B
WPP:
$4.60B
BNZL.L:
£2.30B
WPP:
$2.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNZL.L vs. WPP — Risk / Return Rank
BNZL.L
WPP
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) and WPP plc (WPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNZL.L | WPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.79 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.87 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | -1.22 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNZL.L | WPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | -1.08 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.60 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | -0.36 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.05 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNZL.L drawdown since its inception was -49.05%, smaller than the maximum WPP drawdown of -81.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNZL.L and WPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNZL.L | WPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.05% | -81.43% | +32.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -58.70% | +36.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.50% | -72.95% | +28.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.50% | -77.45% | +32.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.05% | -81.43% | +32.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.84% | -77.86% | +49.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -27.40% | +18.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.50% | 41.59% | -30.09% |
Volatility
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) is 7.51%, while WPP plc (WPP) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that BNZL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNZL.L | WPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 12.99% | -5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 32.49% | -16.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.81% | 47.43% | -26.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 32.70% | -9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 33.26% | -10.18% |
Dividends
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Dividend Comparison
BNZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than WPP's 5.79% yield.
Financials
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunzl plc and WPP plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BNZL.L vs. WPP - Profitability Comparison
BNZL.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunzl plc reported a gross profit of -202.25M and revenue of 8.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -2.3%.
WPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
BNZL.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunzl plc reported an operating income of 585.05M and revenue of 8.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
WPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
BNZL.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunzl plc reported a net income of 368.25M and revenue of 8.97B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
WPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNZL.L and WPP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BNZL.L and WPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer