BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO
BNS.TO (The Bank of Nova Scotia) and HBM.TO (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. BNS.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while HBM.TO operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BNS.TO returned 11.26%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for HBM.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNS.TO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly lower than HBM.TO's 33.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BNS.TO has underperformed HBM.TO with an annualized return of 11.26%, while HBM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
BNS.TO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 60.74%
- 3Y*
- 26.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
HBM.TO
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 33.51%
- 6M
- 51.09%
- 1Y
- 176.00%
- 3Y*
- 79.91%
- 5Y*
- 34.03%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | 14.13% | 38.75% | 27.51% | 3.68% | -22.84% | 37.98% | -0.30% | 11.80% | -12.26% | 12.80% |
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 33.51% | 134.08% | 60.29% | 6.88% | -25.13% | 3.05% | 66.44% | -16.44% | -41.80% | 45.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNS.TO and HBM.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
BNS.TO:
CA$139.23B
HBM.TO:
CA$14.50B
BNS.TO:
CA$7.57
HBM.TO:
CA$1.65
BNS.TO:
14.92
HBM.TO:
22.01
BNS.TO:
2.33
HBM.TO:
6.13
BNS.TO:
1.80
HBM.TO:
4.10
BNS.TO:
CA$61.04B
HBM.TO:
CA$2.36B
BNS.TO:
CA$33.58B
HBM.TO:
CA$851.84M
BNS.TO:
CA$13.09B
HBM.TO:
CA$1.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BNS.TO
HBM.TO
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNS.TO | HBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 1.44 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | 4.93 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.64 | 16.23 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNS.TO | HBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 3.14 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.66 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.09 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, smaller than the maximum HBM.TO drawdown of -92.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS.TO and HBM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNS.TO | HBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -92.61% | +40.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -35.94% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | -38.61% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | -62.23% | +27.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.95% | -84.01% | +45.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -17.47% | +17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -60.52% | +51.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 10.89% | -7.94% |
Volatility
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) is 4.80%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) has a volatility of 25.25%. This indicates that BNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNS.TO | HBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 25.25% | -20.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 45.39% | -33.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 56.56% | -41.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 52.00% | -35.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 55.53% | -36.73% |
Dividends
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Dividend Comparison
BNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than HBM.TO's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.89% | 4.27% | 5.49% | 6.48% | 4.61% | 5.14% | 5.23% | 3.60% | 4.91% | 3.82% | 3.91% | 6.11% |
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.38% |
Financials
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of Nova Scotia and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BNS.TO vs. HBM.TO - Profitability Comparison
BNS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a gross profit of 8.40B and revenue of 17.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
HBM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 339.94M and revenue of 743.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
BNS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported an operating income of 3.43B and revenue of 17.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
HBM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 296.85M and revenue of 743.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.
BNS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a net income of 2.60B and revenue of 17.19B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
HBM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.28M and revenue of 743.51M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNS.TO and HBM.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BNS.TO and HBM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer