BN vs. KKR
BN (Brookfield Corporation) and KKR (KKR & Co. Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, BN returned 14.55%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for KKR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BN vs. KKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly higher than KKR's -26.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BN has underperformed KKR with an annualized return of 14.55%, while KKR has yielded a comparatively higher 23.50% annualized return.
BN
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 6M
- -4.46%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 28.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
KKR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -26.61%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- 1Y
- -23.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
BN vs. KKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | -3.44% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | -26.61% | -13.32% | 79.65% | 80.48% | -36.98% | 85.76% | 41.13% | 51.57% | -4.28% | 41.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BN and KKR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2010 | 0.52 |
The correlation between BN and KKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BN:
$104.69B
KKR:
$88.94B
BN:
$0.56
KKR:
$3.10
BN:
78.31
KKR:
30.04
BN:
171.62
KKR:
3.17
BN:
1.36
KKR:
4.45
BN:
2.44
KKR:
1.10
BN:
$76.58B
KKR:
$19.99B
BN:
$27.02B
KKR:
$8.35B
BN:
$31.07B
KKR:
$9.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN vs. KKR — Risk / Return Rank
BN
KKR
BN vs. KKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BN | KKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.91 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | -0.54 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | -0.99 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BN | KKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | -0.65 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.31 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.54 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
BN vs. KKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than KKR's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and KKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN | KKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -53.10% | -29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -44.62% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -49.42% | +21.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | -49.42% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.42% | -49.42% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -43.68% | +33.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.52% | -16.18% | -12.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 24.21% | -16.28% |
Volatility
BN vs. KKR - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Corporation (BN) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) have volatilities of 9.72% and 10.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BN | KKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 10.21% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.37% | 29.77% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.67% | 37.30% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.24% | 39.23% | -7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 36.64% | -6.44% |
Dividends
BN vs. KKR - Dividend Comparison
BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than KKR's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 0.80% | 0.57% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 1.31% | 0.77% | 1.31% | 1.71% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 4.16% | 10.13% |
Financials
BN vs. KKR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and KKR & Co. Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BN vs. KKR - Profitability Comparison
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
KKR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.98B and revenue of 4.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.5%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
KKR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported an operating income of 205.35M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
KKR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a net income of 405.23M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BN and KKR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KKR has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to BN (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BN dropped -82.22% vs KKR's -53.10%.
BN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BN and KKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer