PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BN vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BN vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Corporation (BN) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than AB's -0.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BN having a 14.55% annualized return and AB not far behind at 14.30%.


BN

1D
-0.83%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
-3.44%
6M
-4.46%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
28.82%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
14.55%

AB

1D
-1.64%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-8.47%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BN vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BN
Brookfield Corporation
-3.44%20.54%44.18%28.60%-34.80%49.30%8.99%52.68%-10.65%33.82%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-0.39%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BN and AB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1988

0.32

The correlation between BN and AB shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BN:

$104.69B

AB:

$3.39B

EPS

BN:

$0.56

AB:

$3.22

PE Ratio

BN:

78.31

AB:

11.38

PS Ratio

BN:

1.36

AB:

14.16

PB Ratio

BN:

2.44

AB:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

BN:

$76.58B

AB:

$250.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BN:

$27.02B

AB:

$250.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BN:

$31.07B

AB:

$252.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BN vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BN
BN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BN vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.02

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.03

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

-0.07

+1.75

BN vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BN Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BN and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

-0.02

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.13

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.46

-0.15

Drawdowns

BN vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-87.65%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.05%

-14.68%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-20.84%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.85%

-45.76%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.42%

-58.08%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-10.44%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.52%

-26.21%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.93%

6.68%

+1.25%

Volatility

BN vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.11%. This indicates that BN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

4.11%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.37%

18.51%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

22.42%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.24%

28.24%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.20%

32.40%

-2.20%

Dividends

BN vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than AB's 9.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.30%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
BN
Brookfield Corporation
0.57%0.52%0.56%0.70%1.44%1.12%1.55%1.11%1.56%1.29%1.58%1.50%

Financials

BN vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
18.39B
0
(BN) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BN and AB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BN has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to AB (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BN dropped -82.22% vs AB's -87.65%.

BN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BN and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer