BMI vs. OLED
BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) and OLED (Universal Display Corporation) are both stocks. BMI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while OLED operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BMI returned 14.38%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for OLED. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMI vs. OLED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -24.83% return, which is significantly lower than OLED's -23.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed OLED with an annualized return of 14.38%, while OLED has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.
BMI
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- -24.83%
- 6M
- -26.08%
- 1Y
- -46.65%
- 3Y*
- -4.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
OLED
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -23.54%
- 6M
- -26.66%
- 1Y
- -40.39%
- 3Y*
- -13.73%
- 5Y*
- -15.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
BMI vs. OLED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -24.83% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
OLED Universal Display Corporation | -23.54% | -19.07% | -22.88% | 78.64% | -33.87% | -27.89% | 11.91% | 120.74% | -45.69% | 206.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMI and OLED is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 1996 | 0.27 |
The correlation between BMI and OLED shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BMI:
$3.83B
OLED:
$4.19B
BMI:
$4.42
OLED:
$4.49
BMI:
29.46
OLED:
19.78
BMI:
1.23
OLED:
2.71
BMI:
4.29
OLED:
6.74
BMI:
3.94
OLED:
2.46
BMI:
$896.73M
OLED:
$626.55M
BMI:
$370.96M
OLED:
$465.05M
BMI:
$199.34M
OLED:
$277.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMI vs. OLED — Risk / Return Rank
BMI
OLED
BMI vs. OLED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMI | OLED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.82 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.88 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.52 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMI | OLED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | -1.06 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.35 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.07 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.14 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
BMI vs. OLED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, smaller than the maximum OLED drawdown of -85.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and OLED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMI | OLED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.22% | -85.55% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.91% | -45.99% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.06% | -62.74% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.06% | -62.74% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -65.20% | +10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.18% | -64.11% | +15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -45.19% | +26.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.67% | 26.64% | +6.03% |
Volatility
BMI vs. OLED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) is 10.39%, while Universal Display Corporation (OLED) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that BMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMI | OLED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.39% | 11.17% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.66% | 29.29% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.19% | 38.14% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 43.81% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.70% | 47.45% | -13.75% |
Dividends
BMI vs. OLED - Dividend Comparison
BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than OLED's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.23% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
OLED Universal Display Corporation | 2.08% | 1.54% | 1.09% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BMI vs. OLED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and Universal Display Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BMI vs. OLED - Profitability Comparison
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.
OLED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.09M and revenue of 142.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
OLED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
OLED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMI and OLED have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OLED has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to BMI (10.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMI dropped -68.22% vs OLED's -85.55%.
BMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMI and OLED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer