BMA vs. LOMA
BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) and LOMA (Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima) are both stocks. BMA operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while LOMA operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, BMA returned 45.54%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for LOMA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BMA vs. LOMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly higher than LOMA's -15.14% return.
BMA
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 71.64%
- 5Y*
- 45.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
LOMA
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -15.14%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- -9.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- —
BMA vs. LOMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | -3.84% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | -7.97% |
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima | -15.14% | 8.46% | 68.41% | 21.03% | 26.57% | 8.46% | -16.62% | -29.74% | -51.69% | 6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and LOMA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between BMA and LOMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BMA:
$5.37B
LOMA:
$1.28B
BMA:
$5.81K
LOMA:
$336.44
BMA:
0.01
LOMA:
0.03
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
$4.76T
LOMA:
$829.94B
BMA:
$2.84T
LOMA:
$182.35B
BMA:
$751.84B
LOMA:
$174.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMA vs. LOMA — Risk / Return Rank
BMA
LOMA
BMA vs. LOMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMA | LOMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.02 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.21 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | -0.47 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMA | LOMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | -0.16 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.38 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.05 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
BMA vs. LOMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, which is greater than LOMA's maximum drawdown of -87.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and LOMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMA | LOMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.66% | -87.17% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.89% | -42.87% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.40% | -48.26% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.40% | -48.26% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.54% | -32.89% | +10.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.84% | -57.05% | +12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.09% | 19.15% | +2.94% |
Volatility
BMA vs. LOMA - Volatility Comparison
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a higher volatility of 16.39% compared to Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) at 14.89%. This indicates that BMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMA | LOMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.39% | 14.89% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 30.25% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.76% | 58.07% | +15.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.42% | 45.87% | +13.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.27% | 55.19% | +7.08% |
Dividends
BMA vs. LOMA - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, while LOMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.70% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% |
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.64% | 15.68% | 0.00% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BMA vs. LOMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BMA vs. LOMA - Profitability Comparison
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 1.91T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
LOMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 57.03B and revenue of 218.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 212.69B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
LOMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 30.51B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 140.24B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
LOMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 41.00B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMA and LOMA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (16.39%) compared to LOMA (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMA dropped -91.66% vs LOMA's -87.17%.
BMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMA and LOMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer