BLK vs. FITB
BLK (BlackRock, Inc.) and FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BLK in Asset Management, FITB in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, BLK returned 13.89%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for FITB. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLK vs. FITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLK achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than FITB's 12.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BLK has underperformed FITB with an annualized return of 13.89%, while FITB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.81% annualized return.
BLK
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -5.28%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
FITB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 36.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
BLK vs. FITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | -6.02% | 6.55% | 29.29% | 17.86% | -20.40% | 29.39% | 47.21% | 31.87% | -21.59% | 38.20% |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 12.00% | 14.75% | 27.20% | 10.41% | -21.94% | 62.46% | -5.43% | 35.20% | -20.32% | 15.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLK and FITB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1999 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BLK and FITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLK:
$164.14B
FITB:
$43.14B
BLK:
$38.89
FITB:
$3.06
BLK:
25.58
FITB:
17.00
BLK:
6.22
FITB:
2.71
BLK:
2.90
FITB:
1.35
BLK:
$25.71B
FITB:
$13.66B
BLK:
$15.21B
FITB:
$9.10B
BLK:
$9.79B
FITB:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLK vs. FITB — Risk / Return Rank
BLK
FITB
BLK vs. FITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLK | FITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.27 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 1.73 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 4.84 | -4.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLK | FITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 1.43 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.28 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.41 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.21 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BLK vs. FITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLK drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum FITB drawdown of -98.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLK and FITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLK | FITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -98.13% | +37.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -21.21% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -29.95% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.90% | -51.68% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.90% | -64.06% | +20.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.94% | -4.81% | -11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -31.45% | +19.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.90% | 7.57% | +2.33% |
Volatility
BLK vs. FITB - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) have volatilities of 8.39% and 8.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLK | FITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 8.36% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.52% | 20.29% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 25.77% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 31.95% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 36.30% | -8.53% |
Dividends
BLK vs. FITB - Dividend Comparison
BLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than FITB's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 2.20% | 1.95% | 1.99% | 2.46% | 2.75% | 1.80% | 2.01% | 2.63% | 3.08% | 1.95% | 2.41% | 2.56% |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 3.02% | 3.29% | 3.41% | 3.94% | 3.84% | 2.62% | 3.92% | 3.06% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 2.59% |
Financials
BLK vs. FITB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock, Inc. and Fifth Third Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLK vs. FITB - Profitability Comparison
BLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.51B and revenue of 6.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
FITB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.
BLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
FITB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
BLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
FITB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLK and FITB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLK has higher volatility (8.39%) compared to FITB (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLK dropped -60.36% vs FITB's -98.13%.
FITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLK and FITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer