BLDR vs. OC
BLDR (Builders FirstSource, Inc.) and OC (Owens Corning) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, BLDR returned 20.07%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for OC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BLDR vs. OC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDR achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than OC's 7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BLDR has outperformed OC with an annualized return of 20.07%, while OC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.
BLDR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -31.96%
- 1Y
- -34.50%
- 3Y*
- -15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.07%
OC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
BLDR vs. OC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | -28.93% | -28.01% | -14.38% | 157.31% | -24.30% | 110.02% | 60.61% | 132.91% | -49.93% | 98.63% |
OC Owens Corning | 7.98% | -33.02% | 16.61% | 77.17% | -4.23% | 20.93% | 18.12% | 50.63% | -51.68% | 80.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDR and OC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2006 | 0.55 |
The correlation between BLDR and OC shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLDR:
$2.63
OC:
-$8.56
BLDR:
0.55
OC:
0.75
BLDR:
$14.82B
OC:
$9.84B
BLDR:
$4.43B
OC:
$2.65B
BLDR:
$1.06B
OC:
$528.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDR vs. OC — Risk / Return Rank
BLDR
OC
BLDR vs. OC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and Owens Corning (OC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLDR | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.98 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.26 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.47 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLDR | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.27 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.14 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.31 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.22 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BLDR vs. OC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDR drawdown since its inception was -96.78%, which is greater than OC's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDR and OC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDR | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.78% | -85.22% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -37.33% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.55% | -52.48% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.55% | -52.48% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.55% | -66.57% | -1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.37% | -41.57% | -23.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.87% | -20.65% | -27.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.59% | 20.65% | +7.94% |
Volatility
BLDR vs. OC - Volatility Comparison
Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Owens Corning (OC) at 10.99%. This indicates that BLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDR | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 10.99% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 25.97% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.94% | 36.03% | +11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.20% | 34.51% | +10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.71% | 35.25% | +12.46% |
Dividends
BLDR vs. OC - Dividend Comparison
BLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OC Owens Corning | 2.48% | 2.47% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.64% | 1.15% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 0.88% | 1.44% | 1.45% |
Financials
BLDR vs. OC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Builders FirstSource, Inc. and Owens Corning. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLDR vs. OC - Profitability Comparison
BLDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 928.97M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
OC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
BLDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.52M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
OC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
BLDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of -47.41M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
OC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDR and OC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDR has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to OC (10.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDR dropped -96.78% vs OC's -85.22%.
OC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDR and OC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer