PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKNG vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKNG vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -23.87% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, BKNG has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 12.13%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


BKNG

1D
-2.13%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-23.87%
6M
-21.25%
1Y
-27.12%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
12.13%

CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNG vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-23.87%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNG and CRM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKNG:

$128.87B

CRM:

$159.00B

EPS

BKNG:

$7.60

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

BKNG:

21.36

CRM:

21.25

PEG Ratio

BKNG:

0.32

CRM:

0.04

PS Ratio

BKNG:

4.75

CRM:

3.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKNG:

$27.69B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKNG:

$22.16B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

BKNG:

$9.27B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKNG vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKNG vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKNGCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.86

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

-0.84

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

-1.62

+0.04

BKNG vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is comparable to the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKNG and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKNGCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

-0.88

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.13

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.24

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.45

-0.31

Drawdowns

BKNG vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKNGCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-70.50%

-28.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.35%

-39.36%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-54.70%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.53%

-58.62%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

-58.62%

+10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.64%

-49.87%

+20.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.07%

-16.12%

-30.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.16%

20.48%

-3.32%

Volatility

BKNG vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is 9.32%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that BKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKNGCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

16.96%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.96%

31.74%

-4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.89%

37.87%

-5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.24%

37.02%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

35.36%

-2.90%

Dividends

BKNG vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than CRM's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.99%0.72%0.70%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%

Financials

BKNG vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booking Holdings Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
5.53B
11.13B
(BKNG) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKNG vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booking Holdings Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
76.9%
Portfolio components
BKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

BKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

BKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKNG and CRM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to BKNG (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs CRM's -70.50%.

BKNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKNG and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer