PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BKLN has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 4.25%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.


BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.25%

XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLN vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-0.04%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and XYLD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.45

The correlation between BKLN and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKLN vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLN
XYLD

Technology

5.8%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
10.2%

Financial Services

2.3%
11.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.9%

Industrials

0.8%
8.3%

Communication Services

0.8%
11.2%

Healthcare

0.8%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

BKLN
5.8%
XYLD
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BKLN
2.3%
XYLD
10.2%

Financial Services

BKLN
2.3%
XYLD
11.8%

Real Estate

BKLN
1.5%
XYLD
1.9%

Industrials

BKLN
0.8%
XYLD
8.3%

Communication Services

BKLN
0.8%
XYLD
11.2%

Healthcare

BKLN
0.8%
XYLD
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

BKLN
0.7%
XYLD
4.9%

Basic Materials

BKLN

-

XYLD
1.8%

Energy

BKLN

-

XYLD
3.5%

Utilities

BKLN

-

XYLD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLN vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLNXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.15

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

16.73

-11.08

BKLN vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLNXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.53

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.68

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.58

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-33.46%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-5.29%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-15.53%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-18.66%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

-33.46%

+9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.64%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-3.72%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.99%

-0.21%

Volatility

BKLN vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 0.44%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

1.33%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

5.46%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

6.60%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

11.23%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

14.21%

-7.78%

BKLN vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLN vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.63%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and XYLD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYLD has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.23% vs 4.25% for BKLN. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 6.63% for BKLN.

BKLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while XYLD is Derivative Income. BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKLN and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer