PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BKLN has outperformed QAI with an annualized return of 4.25%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.


BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.25%

QAI

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
7.58%
6M
8.00%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLN vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-0.04%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
7.58%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%5.73%8.68%-3.32%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and QAI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.49

The correlation between BKLN and QAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKLN vs. QAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLN
QAI

Technology

5.8%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
7.3%

Financial Services

2.3%
19.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.9%

Industrials

0.8%
13.6%

Communication Services

0.8%
11.2%

Healthcare

0.8%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

-

5.3%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Technology

BKLN
5.8%
QAI
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BKLN
2.3%
QAI
7.3%

Financial Services

BKLN
2.3%
QAI
19.5%

Real Estate

BKLN
1.5%
QAI
2.9%

Industrials

BKLN
0.8%
QAI
13.6%

Communication Services

BKLN
0.8%
QAI
11.2%

Healthcare

BKLN
0.8%
QAI
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

BKLN
0.7%
QAI
3.7%

Basic Materials

BKLN

-

QAI
5.3%

Energy

BKLN

-

QAI
3.7%

Utilities

BKLN

-

QAI
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLN vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLNQAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.81

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

15.45

-9.81

BKLN vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and QAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLNQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.26

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.66

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.56

+0.08

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and QAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-14.95%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-3.71%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-7.78%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-14.32%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

-14.95%

-9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.72%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-2.57%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.91%

-0.13%

Volatility

BKLN vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 0.44%, while IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

2.56%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

5.25%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

6.26%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

6.60%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

6.19%

+0.24%

BKLN vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLN vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than QAI's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.63%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.40%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and QAI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QAI has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs QAI's -14.95%.

On 10-year performance, BKLN leads with 4.25% vs 3.79% for QAI. On fees, BKLN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 4.25% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 1.40% for QAI.

BKLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while QAI is Long-Short. BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index, while QAI tracks IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKLN and 0.79% for QAI.

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and QAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer