PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. MNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than MNA's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BKLN has outperformed MNA with an annualized return of 4.25%, while MNA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.


BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.25%

MNA

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLN vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-0.04%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.79%8.59%4.93%0.18%-1.61%-3.24%2.72%4.70%2.13%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and MNA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.23

The correlation between BKLN and MNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKLN vs. MNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLN
MNA

Technology

5.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

2.3%
11.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
5.1%

Industrials

0.8%
22.3%

Communication Services

0.8%
9.2%

Healthcare

0.8%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.3%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

15.3%

Technology

BKLN
5.8%
MNA
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BKLN
2.3%
MNA
2.4%

Financial Services

BKLN
2.3%
MNA
11.4%

Real Estate

BKLN
1.5%
MNA
5.1%

Industrials

BKLN
0.8%
MNA
22.3%

Communication Services

BKLN
0.8%
MNA
9.2%

Healthcare

BKLN
0.8%
MNA
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

BKLN
0.7%
MNA
4.4%

Basic Materials

BKLN

-

MNA
10.3%

Energy

BKLN

-

MNA

-

Utilities

BKLN

-

MNA
15.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MNA
MNA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLN vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLNMNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.17

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.22

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

7.99

-2.35

BKLN vs. MNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the MNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and MNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLNMNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.95

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.37

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.42

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.36

+0.28

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and MNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNMNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-16.68%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-1.40%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-3.01%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-10.45%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

-16.68%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.55%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-2.83%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.56%

+0.22%

Volatility

BKLN vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 0.44%, while IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNMNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

1.66%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

3.59%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

4.75%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

4.98%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

6.55%

-0.12%

BKLN vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLN vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.63%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and MNA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNA has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs MNA's -16.68%.

On 10-year performance, BKLN leads with 4.25% vs 2.74% for MNA. On fees, BKLN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 4.25% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

BKLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while MNA is Hedge Fund. BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKLN and 0.77% for MNA.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and MNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer