PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIZD vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIZD vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 7.80%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


BIZD

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-8.77%
6M
-11.00%
1Y
-13.11%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
7.80%

SPDW

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
12.18%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.89%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.77%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
12.18%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and SPDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.54

The correlation between BIZD and SPDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIZD vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BIZD
SPDW

Financial Services

100.0%
22.9%

Basic Materials

-

7.3%

Communication Services

-

3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Energy

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

19.2%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

-

13.7%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Financial Services

BIZD
100.0%
SPDW
22.9%

Basic Materials

BIZD

-

SPDW
7.3%

Communication Services

BIZD

-

SPDW
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BIZD

-

SPDW
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

BIZD

-

SPDW
5.7%

Energy

BIZD

-

SPDW
5.5%

Healthcare

BIZD

-

SPDW
8.3%

Industrials

BIZD

-

SPDW
19.2%

Real Estate

BIZD

-

SPDW
2.5%

Technology

BIZD

-

SPDW
13.7%

Utilities

BIZD

-

SPDW
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIZD vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIZDSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.32

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

2.43

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

9.42

-10.45

BIZD vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIZDSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

1.74

-2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.54

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.58

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.23

+0.07

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIZDSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-60.02%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

-11.55%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-13.53%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-30.21%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

-34.98%

-20.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.08%

-3.30%

-15.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-12.90%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.79%

2.97%

+9.82%

Volatility

BIZD vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) is 5.32%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that BIZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIZDSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

6.07%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

13.76%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

16.09%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

16.58%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

17.30%

+4.46%

BIZD vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIZD vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, more than SPDW's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.84%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.94%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIZD and SPDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to BIZD (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.06% vs 7.80% for BIZD. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.84%, compared with 2.94% for SPDW.

BIZD is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIZD and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer