BIZD vs. IEMG
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.80%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for IEMG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
BIZD vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 7.80%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.88% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -11.00%
- 1Y
- -13.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
IEMG
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 18.97%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 40.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
BIZD vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.77% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 18.97% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and IEMG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013 | 0.43 |
BIZD vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIZD
IEMG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BIZD
IEMG
Basic Materials
BIZD
-
IEMG
Communication Services
BIZD
-
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
BIZD
-
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
BIZD
-
IEMG
Energy
BIZD
-
IEMG
Healthcare
BIZD
-
IEMG
Industrials
BIZD
-
IEMG
Real Estate
BIZD
-
IEMG
Technology
BIZD
-
IEMG
Utilities
BIZD
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
IEMG
BIZD vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIZD | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.38 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.10 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 11.68 | -12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIZD | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 1.99 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.35 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -38.71% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -13.21% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -17.21% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -35.75% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -38.71% | -16.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.08% | -7.00% | -12.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -12.97% | +6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 3.50% | +9.29% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) is 5.32%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that BIZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 10.33% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 18.35% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 20.62% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 18.62% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 20.14% | +1.62% |
BIZD vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, more than IEMG's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.84% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.31% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and IEMG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to BIZD (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 9.88% vs 7.80% for BIZD. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.84%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.
BIZD is categorized as Financials Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer