BIZD vs. BRLN
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock. BIZD is passively managed, while BRLN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BIZD returned 4.91%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for BRLN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.
Performance
BIZD vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly lower than BRLN's 1.14% return.
BIZD
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -11.00%
- 1Y
- -13.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
BRLN
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIZD vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.77% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | 5.89% |
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 1.14% | 5.38% | 7.49% | 13.42% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and BRLN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
BRLN
BIZD vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIZD | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.29 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.41 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 9.32 | -10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIZD | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 1.54 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 2.16 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and BRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -3.85% | -51.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -2.00% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -3.85% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.08% | -0.42% | -18.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -0.31% | -6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 0.52% | +12.27% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison
VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 1.11%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 1.11% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 2.34% | +12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 3.14% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 3.74% | +13.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 3.74% | +18.02% |
BIZD vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, more than BRLN's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.84% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 6.37% | 6.50% | 7.87% | 9.06% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and BRLN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BRLN (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs BRLN's -3.85%.
On 3-year performance, BRLN leads with 7.18% vs 4.91% for BIZD. On fees, BRLN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BRLN has performed better with a 7.18% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BRLN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.84%, compared with 6.37% for BRLN.
BIZD is categorized as Financials Equities, while BRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.55% for BRLN.
BRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and BRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer