PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIV vs. VMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIV vs. VMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than VMBS's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BIV has outperformed VMBS with an annualized return of 1.83%, while VMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.


BIV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.83%

VMBS

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.91%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. VMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.67%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.27%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and VMBS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.78

The correlation between BIV and VMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIV vs. VMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. VMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIVVMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.55

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

8.40

-4.00

BIV vs. VMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the VMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and VMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIVVMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.60

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.06

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.45

+0.19

Drawdowns

BIV vs. VMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, which is greater than VMBS's maximum drawdown of -17.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and VMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIVVMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-17.47%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.68%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-7.65%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

-17.12%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

-17.47%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.71%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-2.49%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.81%

+0.26%

Volatility

BIV vs. VMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.35%, while Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIVVMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.56%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

3.19%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

4.29%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

6.77%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

5.40%

+0.11%

BIV vs. VMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VMBS's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIV vs. VMBS - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, which matches VMBS's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.24%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.20%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BIV and VMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMBS has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to BIV (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs VMBS's -17.47%.

On 10-year performance, BIV leads with 1.83% vs 1.31% for VMBS. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BIV has performed better with a 1.83% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VMBS.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.20% for VMBS.

BIV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index, while VMBS tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.04% for VMBS.

VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIV and VMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer