PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while SYF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SYF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than SYF's -13.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed SYF with an annualized return of 29.95%, while SYF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
8.60%
YTD
15.90%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
29.95%

SYF

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-13.19%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
15.90%10.04%15.27%4.54%27.87%27.84%14.53%46.25%-11.04%33.26%
SYF
Synchrony Financial
-13.19%24.67%88.75%16.91%-22.83%36.33%-2.45%50.99%-32.62%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and SYF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2014

0.23

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and SYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.85B

SYF:

$24.41B

EPS

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

SYF:

$9.85

PE Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

SYF:

7.16

PEG Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

SYF:

0.68

PS Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

SYF:

1.30

PB Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

5.38

SYF:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

SYF:

$19.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

SYF:

$12.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

SYF:

$4.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SYF
SYF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIP-UN.TOSYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

0.84

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

1.91

+2.49

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the SYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIP-UN.TO and SYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIP-UN.TOSYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.81

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.34

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.31

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.38

+0.61

Drawdowns

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, smaller than the maximum SYF drawdown of -62.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and SYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIP-UN.TOSYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.85%

-62.60%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-28.35%

+16.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.18%

-39.03%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.39%

-45.16%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.85%

-62.60%

+15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-18.60%

+18.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-15.43%

+8.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

12.35%

-7.02%

Volatility

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) is 4.72%, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIP-UN.TOSYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

8.32%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

23.29%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

29.32%

-11.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.96%

37.18%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.59%

39.96%

-1.37%

Dividends

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison

BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SYF's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%
SYF
Synchrony Financial
1.70%1.38%1.54%2.51%2.74%1.90%2.54%2.39%3.07%1.45%0.72%0.00%

Financials

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
6.30B
5.60B
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(SYF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BIP-UN.TO values in CAD, SYF values in USD

BIP-UN.TO vs. SYF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Synchrony Financial over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
26.9%
82.7%
Portfolio components
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

SYF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a gross profit of 4.64B and revenue of 5.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

SYF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported an operating income of 914.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.

SYF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIP-UN.TO and SYF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIP-UN.TO and SYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer