PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while BRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than BRO's -25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed BRO with an annualized return of 29.95%, while BRO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.


BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
8.60%
YTD
15.90%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
29.95%

BRO

1D
-1.19%
1M
5.19%
YTD
-25.51%
6M
-24.31%
1Y
-46.00%
3Y*
-1.16%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
15.90%10.04%15.27%4.54%27.87%27.84%14.53%46.25%-11.04%33.26%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-25.51%-24.96%56.54%22.74%-13.22%49.24%18.19%38.71%17.41%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and BRO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2009

0.16

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and BRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

BRO:

$4.76

PE Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

BRO:

12.18

PEG Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

BRO:

0.89

PS Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

BRO:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

BRO:

$6.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

BRO:

$3.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

BRO:

$1.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIP-UN.TOBRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.70

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.91

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

-1.57

+5.98

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the BRO Sharpe Ratio of -1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIP-UN.TO and BRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIP-UN.TOBRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

-1.58

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.23

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.59

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.42

+0.57

Drawdowns

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, smaller than the maximum BRO drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and BRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIP-UN.TOBRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.85%

-57.87%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-50.69%

+38.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.18%

-57.87%

+18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.39%

-57.87%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.85%

-57.87%

+11.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-54.25%

+53.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-16.28%

+9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

29.32%

-23.99%

Volatility

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) is 4.72%, while Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIP-UN.TOBRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

9.70%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

22.73%

-8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

29.28%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.96%

25.67%

+7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.59%

24.51%

+14.08%

Dividends

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Dividend Comparison

BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BRO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.11%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%

Financials

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Brown & Brown, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
6.30B
1.90B
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(BRO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BIP-UN.TO values in CAD, BRO values in USD

BIP-UN.TO vs. BRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Brown & Brown, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
26.9%
52.3%
Portfolio components
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIP-UN.TO and BRO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIP-UN.TO and BRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer