PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while AEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's -2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed AEM with an annualized return of 29.95%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.56% annualized return.


BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
8.60%
YTD
15.90%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
29.95%

AEM

1D
-0.67%
1M
-14.14%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
41.52%
3Y*
52.00%
5Y*
24.35%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
15.90%10.04%15.27%4.54%27.87%27.84%14.53%46.25%-11.04%33.26%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-2.22%109.51%58.40%6.39%7.48%-22.85%14.60%47.83%-4.07%3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and AEM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2009

0.06

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and AEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.85B

AEM:

$81.34B

EPS

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

AEM:

$10.60

PE Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

AEM:

15.30

PEG Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

AEM:

0.24

PS Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

AEM:

6.04

PB Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

5.38

AEM:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

AEM:

$13.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

AEM:

$8.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

AEM:

$9.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIP-UN.TOAEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.22

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

3.20

+1.21

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIP-UN.TO and AEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIP-UN.TOAEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.96

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.41

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.29

+0.70

Drawdowns

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and AEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIP-UN.TOAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.85%

-70.00%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-34.26%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.18%

-34.26%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.39%

-41.81%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.85%

-54.11%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-34.26%

+33.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-26.81%

+20.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

13.01%

-7.68%

Volatility

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) is 4.72%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIP-UN.TOAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

14.45%

-9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

35.70%

-21.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

43.75%

-25.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.96%

37.38%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.59%

37.88%

+0.71%

Dividends

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than AEM's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%

Financials

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
6.30B
4.10B
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BIP-UN.TO values in CAD, AEM values in USD

BIP-UN.TO vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
26.9%
66.4%
Portfolio components
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIP-UN.TO and AEM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIP-UN.TO and AEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer