PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BINC vs. DSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BINC vs. DSL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) are both funds - BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while DSL is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 3 years, BINC returned 6.84%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for DSL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for DSL.

Performance

BINC vs. DSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than DSL's 1.29% return.

BINC

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

DSL

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
1.29%
6M
2.38%
1Y
-0.92%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINC vs. DSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF		0.61%7.57%5.76%7.12%
DSL
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund		1.29%-0.01%15.00%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BINC and DSL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund

Often compared with BINC:
BINC vs. JPIEBINC vs. PYLDBINC vs. BNDBINC vs. JAAABINC vs. JEPIBINC vs. PONAXBINC vs. AGG
Often compared with DSL:
DSL vs. DLYDSL vs. PDIDSL vs. FHAIXDSL vs. PHKDSL vs. AAPLDSL vs. MODSL vs. VOO

Return for Risk

BINC vs. DSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
DSL
DSL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINC vs. DSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BINCDSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
-0.10

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.52
-0.08

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.99

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

-0.08

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

-0.17

+8.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BINC vs. DSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the DSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINC and DSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BINCDSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

-0.10

+2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.06

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.26

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

0.21

+2.12

Drawdowns

BINC vs. DSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum DSL drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and DSL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BINCDSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-49.51%

+46.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-11.16%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.69%

-14.43%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-34.18%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-49.51%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-6.46%

+5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-8.74%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

5.59%

-4.91%

Volatility

BINC vs. DSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) is 0.70%, while DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BINCDSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

3.53%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

7.56%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28%

9.28%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

14.84%

-11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.00%

20.10%

-17.10%

BINC vs. DSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DSL's 2.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINC vs. DSL - Dividend Comparison

BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than DSL's 12.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF		5.88%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DSL
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund		12.14%11.71%11.38%10.78%13.67%10.74%10.69%9.33%10.39%9.11%9.53%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

BINC and DSL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSL has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to BINC (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs DSL's -49.51%.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINC and DSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer