BILL vs. BND
BILL (Bill.com Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 5 years, BILL returned -25.68%/yr vs -0.05%/yr for BND. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BILL vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILL achieves a -35.57% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.07% return.
BILL
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -15.99%
- YTD
- -35.57%
- 6M
- -35.50%
- 1Y
- -22.97%
- 3Y*
- -32.70%
- 5Y*
- -25.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
BILL vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | -35.57% | -35.62% | 3.82% | -25.12% | -56.27% | 82.53% | 258.74% | 2.15% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.07% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILL and BND is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2019 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILL vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
BILL
BND
BILL vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILL | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.23 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.83 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 5.43 | -6.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILL | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 1.32 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | -0.01 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.58 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
BILL vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILL drawdown since its inception was -89.86%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILL and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILL | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.86% | -18.58% | -71.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.38% | -2.68% | -35.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.39% | -5.92% | -68.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.86% | -17.91% | -71.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.73% | -2.70% | -87.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.64% | -3.06% | -51.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.99% | 0.90% | +18.09% |
Volatility
BILL vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) has a higher volatility of 19.40% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.20%. This indicates that BILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILL | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.40% | 1.20% | +18.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.73% | 2.69% | +47.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.24% | 3.72% | +59.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.44% | 6.02% | +64.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.01% | 5.53% | +67.48% |
Dividends
BILL vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
BILL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILL and BND have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILL has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILL dropped -89.86% vs BND's -18.58%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILL and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer