BIBL vs. FSRNX
BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) and FSRNX (Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund) are both funds - BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index, while FSRNX is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BIBL returned 9.73%/yr vs 2.65%/yr for FSRNX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FSRNX.
Performance
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly higher than FSRNX's 10.29% return.
BIBL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 35.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FSRNX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 11.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 21.01% | 17.27% | 12.49% | 17.87% | -23.26% | 27.44% | 22.62% | 29.68% | -7.64% | 4.42% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 10.29% | 3.03% | 4.99% | 11.93% | -26.14% | 40.66% | -11.31% | 23.78% | -4.91% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBL and FSRNX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between BIBL and FSRNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIBL vs. FSRNX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBL
FSRNX
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBL | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 1.47 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.33 | 4.64 | +12.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBL | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.93 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.14 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.35 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FSRNX drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and FSRNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBL | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -44.26% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -8.47% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.60% | -17.49% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -34.27% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -1.37% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -9.69% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.67% | -0.59% |
Volatility
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Volatility Comparison
Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) at 4.00%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIBL | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 4.00% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 9.53% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 13.36% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 18.90% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 21.40% | -0.30% |
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRNX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIBL vs. FSRNX - Dividend Comparison
BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FSRNX's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 0.98% | 1.01% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 2.68% | 2.77% | 2.86% | 2.84% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 3.33% | 4.52% | 3.62% | 2.27% | 3.40% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIBL and FSRNX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIBL has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to FSRNX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBL dropped -36.12% vs FSRNX's -44.26%.
BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIBL and FSRNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer