BIBL vs. FSAGX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) and FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) are both funds - BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index, while FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, BIBL returned 9.73%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for FSAGX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FSAGX.

Performance

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's -5.74% return.

BIBL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —

FSAGX

• 1D: -8.82%
• 1M: -15.42%
• YTD: -5.74%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 47.23%
• 3Y*: 35.38%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	21.01%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	22.62%	29.68%	-7.64%	4.42%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-5.74%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and FSAGX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017	0.28

The correlation between BIBL and FSAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIBL vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 80
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIBL	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	0.99	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.40	+1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.20	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	1.41	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.33	3.70	+13.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIBL	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	0.99	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.41	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.21	+0.40

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and FSAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIBL	FSAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-77.21%	+41.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-30.97%	+22.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.60%	-30.97%	+10.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	-45.94%	+15.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-30.97%	+28.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-33.35%	+26.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	11.78%	-9.70%

Volatility

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is 5.51%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that BIBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIBL	FSAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	16.14%	-10.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	36.50%	-23.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	43.87%	-28.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.64%	33.84%	-14.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.10%	33.23%	-12.13%

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAGX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIBL vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FSAGX's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.98%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%	0.00%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.44%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIBL and FSAGX in my portfolio?

BIBL and FSAGX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIBL or FSAGX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to BIBL (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBL dropped -36.12% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.