BE vs. SAF.PA
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and SAF.PA (Safran SA) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BE in Electrical Equipment & Parts, SAF.PA in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 5 years, BE returned 58.49%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for SAF.PA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. SAF.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BE is traded in USD, while SAF.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SAF.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 191.83% return, which is significantly higher than SAF.PA's 0.94% return.
BE
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 191.83%
- 6M
- 126.83%
- 1Y
- 1,064.23%
- 3Y*
- 155.85%
- 5Y*
- 58.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SAF.PA
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 16.48%
- 3Y*
- 34.81%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.67%
BE vs. SAF.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 191.83% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -60.08% |
SAF.PA Safran SA | 0.94% | 60.85% | 26.05% | 42.07% | 2.59% | -13.17% | -8.31% | 30.00% | -3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and SAF.PA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. SAF.PA — Risk / Return Rank
BE
SAF.PA
BE vs. SAF.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Safran SA (SAF.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BE | SAF.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.12 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.42 | 0.67 | +22.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.60 | 1.80 | +71.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BE | SAF.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06 | 0.50 | +9.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.64 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
BE vs. SAF.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than SAF.PA's maximum drawdown of -65.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and SAF.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | SAF.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -65.85% | -26.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -24.21% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -24.21% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -41.76% | -34.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -13.82% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.00% | -13.89% | -38.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.59% | 9.01% | +5.58% |
Volatility
BE vs. SAF.PA - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 26.19% compared to Safran SA (SAF.PA) at 10.60%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAF.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | SAF.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.19% | 10.60% | +15.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.40% | 28.77% | +46.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.17% | 32.42% | +74.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.83% | 30.36% | +55.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.94% | 34.60% | +60.34% |
Dividends
BE vs. SAF.PA - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAF.PA Safran SA | 1.12% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 0.85% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 1.32% | 1.53% | 0.97% | 2.15% | 1.96% |
Financials
BE vs. SAF.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Safran SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and SAF.PA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BE and SAF.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer