PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDT.TO vs. UFPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BDT.TO is traded in CAD, while UFPT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UFPT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 112.18% return, which is significantly higher than UFPT's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has underperformed UFPT with an annualized return of 21.38%, while UFPT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.19% annualized return.


BDT.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.25%
YTD
112.18%
6M
119.72%
1Y
124.25%
3Y*
98.06%
5Y*
49.79%
10Y*
21.38%

UFPT

1D
1.55%
1M
0.38%
YTD
3.97%
6M
5.89%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
35.41%
10Y*
27.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
112.18%13.11%85.68%85.25%-12.93%28.05%19.21%24.56%-36.53%16.72%
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
3.97%-13.34%54.16%42.46%78.42%50.70%-8.30%58.34%17.14%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BDT.TO and UFPT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDT.TO:

CA$3.32B

UFPT:

$1.77B

EPS

BDT.TO:

CA$0.89

UFPT:

$8.81

PE Ratio

BDT.TO:

67.21

UFPT:

25.73

PEG Ratio

BDT.TO:

6.06

UFPT:

0.48

PS Ratio

BDT.TO:

0.96

UFPT:

2.90

PB Ratio

BDT.TO:

7.70

UFPT:

4.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$3.46B

UFPT:

$608.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$334.40M

UFPT:

$172.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$190.07M

UFPT:

$111.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDT.TO vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDT.TO
BDT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

UFPT
UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDT.TOUFPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.03

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

-0.08

+5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

-0.16

+15.47

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDT.TO and UFPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDT.TOUFPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

-0.06

+3.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.80

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.48

+0.19

Drawdowns

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, roughly equal to the maximum UFPT drawdown of -68.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and UFPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDT.TOUFPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-68.60%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.20%

-31.28%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.63%

-47.82%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.81%

-47.82%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.46%

-47.82%

-15.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-34.97%

+28.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-18.65%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

16.45%

-8.31%

Volatility

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) at 9.76%. This indicates that BDT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDT.TOUFPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.35%

9.76%

+8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.78%

30.64%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

43.93%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.79%

44.65%

-9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

40.06%

-6.09%

Dividends

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while UFPT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
1.40%2.95%2.25%2.94%4.85%3.97%4.89%5.45%6.38%3.85%8.38%5.84%
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
783.37M
154.20M
(BDT.TO) Total Revenue
(UFPT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BDT.TO values in CAD, UFPT values in USD

BDT.TO vs. UFPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bird Construction Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
7.7%
28.8%
Portfolio components
BDT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

BDT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

BDT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDT.TO and UFPT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDT.TO and UFPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer