PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDT.TO vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BDT.TO is traded in CAD, while RNMBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RNMBY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 112.18% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 21.38%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 39.61% annualized return.


BDT.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.25%
YTD
112.18%
6M
119.72%
1Y
124.25%
3Y*
98.06%
5Y*
49.79%
10Y*
21.38%

RNMBY

1D
0.66%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-21.95%
6M
-24.73%
1Y
-30.41%
3Y*
79.14%
5Y*
74.40%
10Y*
39.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
112.18%13.11%85.68%85.25%-12.93%28.05%19.21%24.56%-36.53%16.72%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-21.95%177.03%116.75%59.47%136.07%-13.88%-4.36%22.86%-23.44%84.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BDT.TO and RNMBY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDT.TO:

CA$3.32B

RNMBY:

$64.70B

EPS

BDT.TO:

CA$0.89

RNMBY:

$3.56

PE Ratio

BDT.TO:

67.21

RNMBY:

77.79

PEG Ratio

BDT.TO:

6.06

RNMBY:

3.55

PS Ratio

BDT.TO:

0.96

RNMBY:

5.85

PB Ratio

BDT.TO:

7.70

RNMBY:

12.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$3.46B

RNMBY:

$9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$334.40M

RNMBY:

$4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$190.07M

RNMBY:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDT.TO
BDT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDT.TORNMBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.91

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

-0.68

+5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

-1.50

+16.82

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDT.TO and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDT.TORNMBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

-0.65

+3.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

1.67

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.96

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.88

-0.20

Drawdowns

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -63.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDT.TORNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-63.85%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.20%

-45.03%

+19.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.63%

-45.03%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.81%

-45.03%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.46%

-63.85%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-40.11%

+33.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-15.17%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

20.26%

-12.12%

Volatility

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) at 16.17%. This indicates that BDT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDT.TORNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.35%

16.17%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.78%

34.37%

-6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

46.80%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.79%

44.95%

-10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

41.58%

-7.61%

Dividends

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than RNMBY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
1.40%2.95%2.25%2.94%4.85%3.97%4.89%5.45%6.38%3.85%8.38%5.84%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%

Financials

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
783.37M
1.97B
(BDT.TO) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BDT.TO values in CAD, RNMBY values in USD

BDT.TO vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bird Construction Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
7.7%
21.9%
Portfolio components
BDT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

BDT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

BDT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDT.TO and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDT.TO and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer