BDT.TO vs. IESC
BDT.TO (Bird Construction Inc.) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO returned 21.38%/yr vs 50.32%/yr for IESC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BDT.TO is traded in CAD, while IESC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IESC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 112.18% return, which is significantly higher than IESC's 92.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 21.38%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 50.32% annualized return.
BDT.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 12.25%
- YTD
- 112.18%
- 6M
- 119.72%
- 1Y
- 124.25%
- 3Y*
- 98.06%
- 5Y*
- 49.79%
- 10Y*
- 21.38%
IESC
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 12.52%
- YTD
- 92.36%
- 6M
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 167.82%
- 3Y*
- 143.72%
- 5Y*
- 73.89%
- 10Y*
- 50.32%
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 112.18% | 13.11% | 85.68% | 85.25% | -12.93% | 28.05% | 19.21% | 24.56% | -36.53% | 16.72% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 92.36% | 84.74% | 175.15% | 117.42% | -25.31% | 9.94% | 75.17% | 58.22% | -2.28% | -16.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDT.TO and IESC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, BDT.TO and IESC have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BDT.TO:
CA$3.32B
IESC:
$14.83B
BDT.TO:
CA$0.89
IESC:
$18.85
BDT.TO:
67.21
IESC:
38.98
BDT.TO:
6.06
IESC:
0.47
BDT.TO:
0.96
IESC:
4.08
BDT.TO:
7.70
IESC:
13.83
BDT.TO:
CA$3.46B
IESC:
$3.63B
BDT.TO:
CA$334.40M
IESC:
$931.31M
BDT.TO:
CA$190.07M
IESC:
$487.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDT.TO vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
BDT.TO
IESC
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDT.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 7.63 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 22.19 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDT.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 2.71 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 1.04 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.08 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -97.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDT.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -97.03% | +29.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.20% | -22.12% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.63% | -50.15% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.81% | -53.10% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.46% | -53.10% | -10.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -0.60% | -5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -48.06% | +30.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.14% | 7.61% | +0.53% |
Volatility
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 12.14%. This indicates that BDT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDT.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.35% | 12.14% | +6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.78% | 50.15% | -22.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.95% | 62.45% | -21.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.79% | 54.30% | -19.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 48.62% | -14.65% |
Dividends
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 1.40% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.94% | 4.85% | 3.97% | 4.89% | 5.45% | 6.38% | 3.85% | 8.38% | 5.84% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDT.TO vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
BDT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
BDT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
BDT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDT.TO and IESC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BDT.TO and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer