PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDT.TO vs. CAMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BDT.TO is traded in CAD, while CAMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CAMT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 112.18% return, which is significantly higher than CAMT's 61.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of 21.38%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 57.96% annualized return.


BDT.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.25%
YTD
112.18%
6M
119.72%
1Y
124.25%
3Y*
98.06%
5Y*
49.79%
10Y*
21.38%

CAMT

1D
3.00%
1M
-16.23%
YTD
61.50%
6M
43.14%
1Y
134.18%
3Y*
78.31%
5Y*
38.18%
10Y*
57.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
112.18%13.11%85.68%85.25%-12.93%28.05%19.21%24.56%-36.53%16.72%
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
61.50%25.65%28.35%208.42%-49.28%110.03%97.51%56.46%30.53%65.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BDT.TO and CAMT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.13

The correlation between BDT.TO and CAMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDT.TO:

CA$3.32B

CAMT:

$8.68B

EPS

BDT.TO:

CA$0.89

CAMT:

$0.98

PE Ratio

BDT.TO:

67.21

CAMT:

172.44

PEG Ratio

BDT.TO:

6.06

CAMT:

35.14

PS Ratio

BDT.TO:

0.96

CAMT:

16.60

PB Ratio

BDT.TO:

7.70

CAMT:

12.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$3.46B

CAMT:

$499.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$334.40M

CAMT:

$250.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDT.TO:

CA$190.07M

CAMT:

$122.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDT.TO vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDT.TO
BDT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CAMT
CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDT.TOCAMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.32

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

5.04

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

12.58

+2.73

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the CAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDT.TO and CAMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDT.TOCAMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

2.15

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.69

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.11

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.36

+0.32

Drawdowns

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum CAMT drawdown of -96.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and CAMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDT.TOCAMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-96.87%

+28.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.20%

-26.77%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.63%

-61.96%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.81%

-61.96%

+19.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.46%

-61.96%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-17.14%

+10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-47.89%

+29.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

10.70%

-2.56%

Volatility

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) is 18.35%, while Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a volatility of 29.78%. This indicates that BDT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDT.TOCAMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.35%

29.78%

-11.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.78%

49.31%

-21.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

63.01%

-22.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.79%

56.03%

-21.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

52.26%

-18.29%

Dividends

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison

BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
1.40%2.95%2.25%2.94%4.85%3.97%4.89%5.45%6.38%3.85%8.38%5.84%
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
0.00%0.00%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.57%2.07%2.45%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and Camtek Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
783.37M
121.66M
(BDT.TO) Total Revenue
(CAMT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BDT.TO values in CAD, CAMT values in USD

BDT.TO vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bird Construction Inc. and Camtek Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
7.7%
50.1%
Portfolio components
BDT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

BDT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

BDT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDT.TO and CAMT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDT.TO and CAMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer