BDGI.TO vs. CLS
BDGI.TO (Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. BDGI.TO operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BDGI.TO returned 17.49%/yr vs 44.47%/yr for CLS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BDGI.TO is traded in CAD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDGI.TO achieves a 28.53% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 33.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BDGI.TO has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 17.49%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 44.47% annualized return.
BDGI.TO
- 1D
- 5.73%
- 1M
- 11.40%
- YTD
- 28.53%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 108.80%
- 3Y*
- 54.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.49%
CLS
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 33.13%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 226.64%
- 3Y*
- 213.99%
- 5Y*
- 120.95%
- 10Y*
- 44.47%
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGI.TO Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. | 28.53% | 106.79% | -10.29% | 56.01% | -14.16% | -14.97% | 10.27% | 10.51% | 20.89% | -14.08% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 33.13% | 205.65% | 241.92% | 153.62% | 7.67% | 37.85% | -4.73% | -9.59% | -9.28% | -17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDGI.TO and CLS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BDGI.TO and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDGI.TO:
CA$3.16B
CLS:
$44.72B
BDGI.TO:
CA$2.01
CLS:
$8.28
BDGI.TO:
46.56
CLS:
46.65
BDGI.TO:
1.29
CLS:
0.63
BDGI.TO:
3.31
CLS:
3.24
BDGI.TO:
10.86
CLS:
21.31
BDGI.TO:
CA$955.05M
CLS:
$13.81B
BDGI.TO:
CA$221.07M
CLS:
$1.60B
BDGI.TO:
CA$178.82M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDGI.TO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
BDGI.TO
CLS
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDGI.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.40 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 7.27 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 17.89 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDGI.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 3.16 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 2.10 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.89 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.31 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.09%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -87.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGI.TO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDGI.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.09% | -87.69% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -31.40% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.75% | -54.77% | +24.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.62% | -54.77% | +19.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.09% | -79.60% | +18.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.56% | +17.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.47% | -50.32% | +30.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.16% | 12.73% | -2.57% |
Volatility
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) is 9.02%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.44%. This indicates that BDGI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDGI.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 26.44% | -17.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.35% | 55.02% | -24.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.67% | 72.42% | -36.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.49% | 57.95% | -24.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 50.19% | -15.30% |
Dividends
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
BDGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGI.TO Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. | 0.81% | 1.03% | 2.01% | 1.69% | 2.48% | 1.97% | 1.57% | 1.62% | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.20% | 1.47% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDGI.TO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
BDGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 49.86M and revenue of 203.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
BDGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.08M and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
BDGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 862.00K and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDGI.TO and CLS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BDGI.TO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer