PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVSX vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVSX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVSX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.83%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


BBVSX

1D
-1.53%
1M
0.13%
YTD
11.31%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.83%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVSX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
11.31%-2.25%10.61%15.05%-9.75%28.14%6.07%28.04%-14.47%12.65%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVSX and VTV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.89

The correlation between BBVSX and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVSX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVSX
BBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVSX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBVSXVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.45

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

4.03

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

15.20

-13.00

BBVSX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVSX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBVSXVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.52

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.82

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

BBVSX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVSX drawdown since its inception was -43.42%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVSX and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVSXVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.42%

-59.27%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-6.35%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.25%

-14.52%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-17.04%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.42%

-36.78%

-6.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-1.11%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-7.87%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

1.68%

+3.52%

Volatility

BBVSX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that BBVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVSXVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.65%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

7.67%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.49%

10.18%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

13.89%

+5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

16.68%

+4.33%

BBVSX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBVSX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

BBVSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%6.75%3.88%7.57%10.92%2.38%1.32%5.03%1.18%0.82%0.68%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBVSX and VTV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBVSX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVSX dropped -43.42% vs VTV's -59.27%.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVSX and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer