PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVLX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVLX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVLX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 11.84%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return.


BBVLX

1D
-1.72%
1M
1.34%
YTD
8.00%
6M
0.78%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.84%

DFISX

1D
-2.33%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
6.48%
6M
9.54%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
8.00%4.45%22.32%13.84%-5.32%26.23%9.57%28.49%-8.15%17.20%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
6.48%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVLX and DFISX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.73

The correlation between BBVLX and DFISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVLX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVLX
BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBVLXDFISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.85

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

6.79

-4.11

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVLX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBVLXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.59

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.46

+0.15

Drawdowns

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVLX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVLX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVLXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-60.66%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-11.96%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-13.68%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-35.06%

+16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

-43.00%

+4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-4.16%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-11.64%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.25%

+0.85%

Volatility

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) is 3.08%, while DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that BBVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVLXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.95%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

11.30%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

13.94%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.92%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

16.21%

+1.74%

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVLX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBVLX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

BBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than DFISX's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
1.69%1.89%14.73%5.11%9.12%7.09%1.62%1.80%3.45%2.23%1.68%1.24%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.95%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBVLX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFISX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to BBVLX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVLX dropped -38.48% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

DFISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVLX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer