BBUS vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. BBUS is passively managed, while RLY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.01%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for RLY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

BBUS vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return.

BBUS

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.40%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: —

RLY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	8.45%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	27.13%	20.69%	16.53%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	14.36%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and RLY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between BBUS and RLY has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBUS vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBUS	RLY
Technology	39.7%	-
Communication Services	11.3%	-
Financial Services	10.5%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	2.6%
Healthcare	7.9%	0.8%
Industrials	6.9%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	3.6%
Energy	3.0%	30.1%
Utilities	1.9%	15.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	5.4%
Basic Materials	0.9%	25.1%

Return for Risk

BBUS vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 91
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBUS	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.73	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.69	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.51	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	7.16	-4.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.09	25.86	-13.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBUS vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBUS	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.73	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.73	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.36	+0.46

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBUS	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-37.75%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-3.93%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.01%	-10.08%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.46%	-18.94%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-3.93%	+1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-9.45%	+4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.09%	+0.93%

Volatility

BBUS vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that BBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBUS	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.47%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	8.46%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	10.34%	+1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	13.57%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	13.83%	+5.77%

BBUS vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBUS vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.00%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.93%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBUS and RLY in my portfolio?

BBUS and RLY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBUS or RLY?

BBUS has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, BBUS or RLY?

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 9.85% for RLY. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBUS or RLY?

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBUS or RLY?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBUS or RLY?

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

What is the main difference between BBUS and RLY?

BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.50% for RLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.