PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 12.55% return.


BBUS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.40%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*

IJH

1D
0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.45%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
12.55%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and IJH is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.85

The correlation between BBUS and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
IJH

Technology

39.7%
15.7%

Communication Services

11.3%
1.0%

Financial Services

10.5%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.7%

Healthcare

7.9%
8.6%

Industrials

6.9%
25.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.8%

Energy

3.0%
5.5%

Utilities

1.9%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

0.9%
4.8%

Technology

BBUS
39.7%
IJH
15.7%

Communication Services

BBUS
11.3%
IJH
1.0%

Financial Services

BBUS
10.5%
IJH
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.7%
IJH
10.7%

Healthcare

BBUS
7.9%
IJH
8.6%

Industrials

BBUS
6.9%
IJH
25.0%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.0%
IJH
3.8%

Energy

BBUS
3.0%
IJH
5.5%

Utilities

BBUS
1.9%
IJH
3.1%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.1%
IJH
7.5%

Basic Materials

BBUS
0.9%
IJH
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBUSIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.61

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

9.55

+2.54

BBUS vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBUSIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.48

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.40

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.46

+0.36

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-55.07%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.83%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-24.10%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-24.10%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-1.79%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-7.57%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.41%

-0.39%

Volatility

BBUS vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 3.78%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.17%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

11.49%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

15.64%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

19.76%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

21.19%

-1.59%

BBUS vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IJH's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBUS and IJH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to BBUS (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 7.86% for IJH. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.05% for IJH.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer