PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBP vs. PSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBP vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 93.40% return. Over the past 10 years, BBP has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 11.99%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 33.31% annualized return.


BBP

1D
-0.72%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
5.23%
6M
7.53%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
11.99%

PSI

1D
5.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
93.40%
6M
86.01%
1Y
182.03%
3Y*
52.78%
5Y*
30.45%
10Y*
33.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
5.23%33.15%3.32%17.88%0.85%-8.17%22.24%24.73%-13.95%24.07%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
93.40%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and PSI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014

0.47

The correlation between BBP and PSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBP vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBP
PSI

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

97.6%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBP
100.0%
PSI

-

Basic Materials

BBP

-

PSI

-

Communication Services

BBP

-

PSI

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBP

-

PSI

-

Consumer Defensive

BBP

-

PSI

-

Energy

BBP

-

PSI

-

Financial Services

BBP

-

PSI

-

Industrials

BBP

-

PSI
2.4%

Real Estate

BBP

-

PSI

-

Technology

BBP

-

PSI
97.6%

Utilities

BBP

-

PSI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBP vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBPPSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

11.84

-7.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

42.10

-29.11

BBP vs. PSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the PSI Sharpe Ratio of 4.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and PSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBPPSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

4.64

-2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.80

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.95

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.58

-0.19

Drawdowns

BBP vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and PSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBPPSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.32%

-62.96%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-15.48%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-41.07%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.28%

-44.85%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-44.85%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-6.89%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-15.93%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.34%

-1.32%

Volatility

BBP vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is 6.81%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.07%. This indicates that BBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBPPSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

18.07%

-11.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

32.42%

-13.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.85%

39.52%

-15.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.34%

38.19%

-11.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

35.29%

-7.88%

BBP vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBP vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.05%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBP and PSI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to BBP (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs PSI's -62.96%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 33.31% vs 11.99% for BBP. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, BBP has been the lower-risk option at 6.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 33.31% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

PSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

BBP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.56% for PSI.

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBP and PSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer