BBGLX vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BBGLX (Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both funds - BBGLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bridge Builder, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX returned 13.43%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for VTV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBGLX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

BBGLX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 13.43%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.

BBGLX

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: -7.50%
• 1Y: 2.41%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

VTV

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 6M: 13.41%
• 1Y: 25.49%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	2.37%	2.79%	21.45%	32.21%	-26.82%	23.34%	34.84%	33.32%	0.10%	25.33%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	11.91%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and VTV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between BBGLX and VTV has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX

BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 84
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBGLX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	2.52	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	3.58	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.45	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	4.03	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	15.20	-14.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBGLX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBGLX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	2.52	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.82	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.75	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.51	+0.13

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBGLX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-59.27%	+26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.44%	-6.35%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	-14.52%	-7.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-17.04%	-15.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	-36.78%	+4.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-1.11%	-8.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-7.87%	+1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.96%	1.68%	+7.28%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBGLX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	2.65%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.61%	7.67%	+5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	10.18%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	13.89%	+5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	16.68%	+2.76%

BBGLX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBGLX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.16%	0.78%	0.71%	7.71%	3.67%	2.05%	5.25%	0.80%	0.92%	0.52%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.87%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBGLX and VTV in my portfolio?

BBGLX and VTV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBGLX or VTV?

BBGLX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.