PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGLX vs. VDADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than VDADX's 6.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBGLX having a 13.43% annualized return and VDADX not far behind at 13.05%.


BBGLX

1D
-2.55%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
2.37%
6M
-7.50%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
13.43%

VDADX

1D
-1.36%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6.53%
6M
6.41%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
2.37%2.79%21.45%32.21%-26.82%23.34%34.84%33.32%0.10%25.33%
VDADX
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares
6.53%14.17%16.99%14.44%-9.80%23.59%15.47%29.68%-2.06%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and VDADX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.83

The correlation between BBGLX and VDADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. VDADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX
BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VDADX
VDADX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VDADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDADX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VDADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDADX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBGLXVDADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.39

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

9.65

-9.26

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the VDADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and VDADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBGLXVDADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.87

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.73

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.76

-0.12

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VDADX drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and VDADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGLXVDADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-31.70%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.44%

-7.93%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-14.95%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-20.42%

-11.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-31.70%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.20%

-1.36%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-3.40%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.96%

1.96%

+7.00%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX) at 2.55%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGLXVDADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.55%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

7.70%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

10.16%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

14.28%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

16.20%

+3.24%

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VDADX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBGLX vs. VDADX - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.16%0.78%0.71%7.71%3.67%2.05%5.25%0.80%0.92%0.52%
VDADX
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.46%1.60%1.71%1.86%1.94%1.53%1.61%1.69%2.07%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBGLX and VDADX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBGLX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to VDADX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs VDADX's -31.70%.

VDADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGLX and VDADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer