BBGLX vs. SCZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BBGLX (Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - BBGLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bridge Builder, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX returned 13.43%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for SCZ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBGLX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.

Performance

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 13.43%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.

BBGLX

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: -7.50%
• 1Y: 2.41%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

SCZ

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 15.34%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 8.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	2.37%	2.79%	21.45%	32.21%	-26.82%	23.34%	34.84%	33.32%	0.10%	25.33%
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	7.96%	32.08%	1.52%	12.98%	-21.27%	10.12%	11.71%	24.68%	-17.64%	32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and SCZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015	0.71

The correlation between BBGLX and SCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX

BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SCZ

SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBGLX	SCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.47	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	2.10	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.27	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.89	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	7.18	-6.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBGLX	SCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	1.47	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.28	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.47	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.26	+0.38

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and SCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBGLX	SCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-61.86%	+29.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.44%	-11.43%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	-15.06%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-36.87%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	-41.07%	+8.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-3.23%	-5.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-13.06%	+6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.96%	3.00%	+5.96%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) is 3.95%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that BBGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBGLX	SCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	4.69%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.61%	12.26%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	14.71%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	16.78%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	17.45%	+1.99%

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBGLX vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.16%	0.78%	0.71%	7.71%	3.67%	2.05%	5.25%	0.80%	0.92%	0.52%
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	3.05%	3.30%	3.50%	2.96%	1.99%	2.96%	1.52%	3.52%	2.79%	2.38%	2.82%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBGLX and SCZ in my portfolio?

BBGLX and SCZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBGLX or SCZ?

SCZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to BBGLX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.