BBEU vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BBEU (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. BBEU is passively managed, while RLY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBEU returned 8.62%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for RLY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBEU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

BBEU vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return.

BBEU

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 8.45%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: —

RLY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF	5.14%	36.37%	1.85%	20.31%	-14.72%	17.50%	5.00%	23.96%	-13.25%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	14.36%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	15.63%	-12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and RLY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between BBEU and RLY has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBEU vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBEU	RLY
Financial Services	21.7%	0.0%
Industrials	14.9%	16.5%
Healthcare	10.7%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	3.6%
Technology	7.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	2.6%
Basic Materials	4.5%	25.1%
Energy	3.4%	30.1%
Utilities	2.9%	15.9%
Communication Services	2.8%	-
Real Estate	0.3%	5.4%

Return for Risk

BBEU vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU

BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 32
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 36

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 91
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBEU	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.73	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.69	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.51	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	7.16	-5.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	25.86	-20.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBEU vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBEU	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	2.73	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.73	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.36	+0.11

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, roughly equal to the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBEU	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.27%	-37.75%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-3.93%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.23%	-10.08%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.08%	-18.94%	-12.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-3.93%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-9.45%	+3.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	1.09%	+2.21%

Volatility

BBEU vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that BBEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBEU	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	3.47%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	8.46%	+4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.67%	10.34%	+5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.52%	13.57%	+3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	13.83%	+5.49%

BBEU vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBEU vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF	2.83%	2.83%	4.16%	2.94%	4.72%	2.63%	2.29%	3.24%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.93%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBEU and RLY in my portfolio?

BBEU and RLY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBEU or RLY?

BBEU has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, BBEU or RLY?

On 5-year performance, RLY leads with 9.85% vs 8.62% for BBEU. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBEU or RLY?

Over the 5-year period, RLY has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBEU or RLY?

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBEU or RLY?

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.83% for BBEU.

What is the main difference between BBEU and RLY?

BBEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBEU and 0.50% for RLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.