PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. MNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than MNA's 1.79% return.


BBEU

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
5.14%
6M
8.45%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*

MNA

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
5.14%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-13.25%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.79%8.59%4.93%0.18%-1.61%-3.24%2.72%4.70%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and MNA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.40

BBEU vs. MNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBEU
MNA

Financial Services

21.7%
11.4%

Industrials

14.9%
22.3%

Healthcare

10.7%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
4.4%

Technology

7.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

4.5%
10.3%

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.9%
15.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
9.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
5.1%

Financial Services

BBEU
21.7%
MNA
11.4%

Industrials

BBEU
14.9%
MNA
22.3%

Healthcare

BBEU
10.7%
MNA
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBEU
8.3%
MNA
4.4%

Technology

BBEU
7.8%
MNA
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BBEU
4.8%
MNA
2.4%

Basic Materials

BBEU
4.5%
MNA
10.3%

Energy

BBEU
3.4%
MNA

-

Utilities

BBEU
2.9%
MNA
15.3%

Communication Services

BBEU
2.8%
MNA
9.2%

Real Estate

BBEU
0.3%
MNA
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MNA
MNA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEUMNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.22

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

7.99

-2.96

BBEU vs. MNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the MNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and MNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEUMNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.95

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.36

+0.11

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and MNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUMNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-16.68%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-1.40%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-3.01%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-10.45%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.55%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-2.83%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

0.56%

+2.74%

Volatility

BBEU vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.66%. This indicates that BBEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUMNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

1.66%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

3.59%

+9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

4.75%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

4.98%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

6.55%

+12.77%

BBEU vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBEU vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.83%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEU and MNA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEU has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to MNA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs MNA's -16.68%.

On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 8.62% vs 1.83% for MNA. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MNA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

BBEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while MNA is Hedge Fund. BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBEU and 0.77% for MNA.

BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and MNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer