BATS.L vs. QQQI
BATS.L (British American Tobacco plc) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, BATS.L returned 34.97% vs 27.58% for QQQI. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BATS.L is traded in GBp, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 11.00% return.
BATS.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 34.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
QQQI
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 7.56% | 56.35% | 33.94% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 11.00% | 10.17% | 21.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATS.L and QQQI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATS.L vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
BATS.L
QQQI
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATS.L | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 3.19 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 10.51 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATS.L | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 2.10 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.07 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATS.L | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -21.94% | -32.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -8.67% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.94% | -2.54% | -7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -3.50% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 2.63% | +3.06% |
Volatility
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 4.47%. This indicates that BATS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATS.L | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 4.47% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.26% | 9.64% | +8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 13.20% | +9.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 17.28% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 17.28% | +6.64% |
Dividends
BATS.L vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than QQQI's 13.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.40% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.61% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATS.L and QQQI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BATS.L and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer