PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATS.L vs. GSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BATS.L vs. GSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BATS.L is traded in GBp, while GSK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than GSK's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has outperformed GSK with an annualized return of 7.31%, while GSK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.


BATS.L

1D
1.48%
1M
4.73%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.51%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
7.31%

GSK

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.44%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.97%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATS.L vs. GSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
7.56%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-47.15%13.39%
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
5.93%40.46%-3.48%4.23%-25.50%27.94%-20.13%24.32%20.54%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BATS.L and GSK is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.33

The correlation between BATS.L and GSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BATS.L:

£97.89B

GSK:

$103.15B

EPS

BATS.L:

£4.91

GSK:

$2.85

PE Ratio

BATS.L:

9.10

GSK:

17.78

PEG Ratio

BATS.L:

0.34

GSK:

1.19

PS Ratio

BATS.L:

1.91

GSK:

3.16

PB Ratio

BATS.L:

2.04

GSK:

4.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

BATS.L:

£51.48B

GSK:

$32.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BATS.L:

£35.04B

GSK:

$23.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

BATS.L:

£17.11B

GSK:

$11.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATS.L vs. GSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GSK
GSK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATS.L vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATS.LGSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

1.57

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

3.78

+2.35

BATS.L vs. GSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the GSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATS.L and GSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATS.LGSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.10

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.24

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.24

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.27

+0.13

Drawdowns

BATS.L vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, which is greater than GSK's maximum drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and GSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATS.LGSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-41.45%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-18.61%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-25.71%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-41.45%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-41.45%

-12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.94%

-14.96%

+5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-12.21%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

7.71%

-2.02%

Volatility

BATS.L vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison

British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) at 6.74%. This indicates that BATS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATS.LGSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

6.74%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

18.57%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

26.61%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

24.57%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

22.80%

+1.12%

Dividends

BATS.L vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison

BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than GSK's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
3.41%3.42%4.60%3.75%5.47%4.99%5.59%4.35%5.65%5.83%6.86%5.93%

Financials

BATS.L vs. GSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco plc and GlaxoSmithKline plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B202120222023202420252026
13.54B
7.63B
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
(GSK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BATS.L values in GBp, GSK values in USD

BATS.L vs. GSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between British American Tobacco plc and GlaxoSmithKline plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
61.1%
75.4%
Portfolio components
BATS.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

GSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.

BATS.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

GSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

BATS.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

GSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BATS.L and GSK have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATS.L and GSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer