BATS.L vs. BAG.L
BATS.L (British American Tobacco plc) and BAG.L (A.G.Barr plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — BATS.L in Tobacco, BAG.L in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L returned 7.31%/yr vs 3.88%/yr for BAG.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than BAG.L's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has outperformed BAG.L with an annualized return of 7.31%, while BAG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.88% annualized return.
BATS.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 34.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
BAG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 7.56% | 56.35% | 37.24% | -23.51% | 28.17% | 9.10% | -9.61% | 38.29% | -47.15% | 13.39% |
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 0.99% | 5.05% | 21.87% | -1.23% | 5.31% | 1.72% | -10.52% | -24.80% | 21.06% | 35.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATS.L and BAG.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
BATS.L:
£97.89B
BAG.L:
£688.86M
BATS.L:
£4.91
BAG.L:
£0.77
BATS.L:
9.10
BAG.L:
7.94
BATS.L:
0.34
BAG.L:
0.56
BATS.L:
1.91
BAG.L:
0.80
BATS.L:
2.04
BAG.L:
2.04
BATS.L:
£51.48B
BAG.L:
£857.70M
BATS.L:
£35.04B
BAG.L:
£340.30M
BATS.L:
£17.11B
BAG.L:
£139.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATS.L vs. BAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BATS.L
BAG.L
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATS.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.60 | +3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | -1.08 | +7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATS.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | -0.44 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.27 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.14 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.18 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, smaller than the maximum BAG.L drawdown of -93.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and BAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATS.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -93.03% | +38.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -13.45% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | -16.05% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | -24.81% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | -61.52% | +7.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.94% | -26.68% | +16.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -21.35% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 7.47% | -1.78% |
Volatility
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Volatility Comparison
British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that BATS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATS.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 5.07% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.26% | 14.75% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 18.49% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 22.62% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 27.07% | -3.15% |
Dividends
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Dividend Comparison
BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than BAG.L's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 3.04% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.35% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 1.99% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.32% |
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.40% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco plc and A.G.Barr plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BATS.L vs. BAG.L - Profitability Comparison
BATS.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
BAG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported a gross profit of 80.90M and revenue of 209.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
BATS.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
BAG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported an operating income of 27.40M and revenue of 209.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
BATS.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
BAG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported a net income of 19.40M and revenue of 209.20M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BATS.L and BAG.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BATS.L and BAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer