PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATS.L vs. ABDN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than ABDN.L's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has outperformed ABDN.L with an annualized return of 7.31%, while ABDN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return.


BATS.L

1D
1.48%
1M
4.73%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.51%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
7.31%

ABDN.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
7.36%
YTD
19.18%
6M
25.02%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
7.56%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-47.15%13.39%
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
19.18%57.94%-12.84%2.11%-14.88%-9.77%-5.36%38.83%-44.96%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BATS.L and ABDN.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between BATS.L and ABDN.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BATS.L:

£4.91

ABDN.L:

£0.70

PE Ratio

BATS.L:

9.10

ABDN.L:

3.39

PEG Ratio

BATS.L:

0.34

ABDN.L:

0.00

PS Ratio

BATS.L:

1.91

ABDN.L:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

BATS.L:

£51.48B

ABDN.L:

£3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BATS.L:

£35.04B

ABDN.L:

£3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

BATS.L:

£17.11B

ABDN.L:

£796.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ABDN.L
ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATS.LABDN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.60

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

7.62

-1.49

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATS.L and ABDN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATS.LABDN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.34

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.15

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.10

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.13

+0.28

Drawdowns

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, smaller than the maximum ABDN.L drawdown of -64.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and ABDN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATS.LABDN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-64.13%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-14.76%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-37.10%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-50.49%

+20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-61.82%

+7.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.94%

-14.50%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-28.92%

+13.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

5.04%

+0.65%

Volatility

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Volatility Comparison

British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) at 8.11%. This indicates that BATS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABDN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATS.LABDN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

8.11%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

23.85%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

28.65%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

32.62%

-12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

33.91%

-9.99%

Dividends

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Dividend Comparison

BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than ABDN.L's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
6.18%7.10%10.34%8.17%7.71%6.06%7.68%6.58%10.54%5.33%5.78%5.12%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BATS.L vs. ABDN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco plc and Abrdn plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
13.54B
1.04B
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
(ABDN.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BATS.L and ABDN.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATS.L and ABDN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer