PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAM vs. MORN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAM vs. MORN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Morningstar, Inc. (MORN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -10.42% return, which is significantly higher than MORN's -16.03% return.


BAM

1D
-0.45%
1M
-6.66%
YTD
-10.42%
6M
-11.77%
1Y
-17.14%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10Y*

MORN

1D
-2.29%
1M
2.72%
YTD
-16.03%
6M
-15.94%
1Y
-41.38%
3Y*
-3.23%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAM vs. MORN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
-10.42%-0.24%39.70%45.61%-10.41%
MORN
Morningstar, Inc.
-16.03%-35.05%18.29%33.10%-13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and MORN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.42

The correlation between BAM and MORN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAM:

$74.44B

MORN:

$7.13B

EPS

BAM:

$1.55

MORN:

$9.74

PE Ratio

BAM:

29.64

MORN:

18.63

PEG Ratio

BAM:

0.05

MORN:

0.37

PS Ratio

BAM:

14.71

MORN:

2.99

PB Ratio

BAM:

6.63

MORN:

7.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAM:

$5.08B

MORN:

$2.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAM:

$3.26B

MORN:

$1.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAM:

$2.35B

MORN:

$743.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAM vs. MORN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM
BAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MORN
MORN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MORN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MORN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MORN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MORN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MORN Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM vs. MORN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Morningstar, Inc. (MORN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMMORNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.78

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.82

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-1.27

+0.23

BAM vs. MORN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is higher than the MORN Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and MORN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMMORNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-1.21

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.39

+0.11

Drawdowns

BAM vs. MORN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum MORN drawdown of -67.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and MORN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMMORNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-67.92%

+37.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-50.65%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.37%

-56.70%

+26.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.56%

-48.81%

+24.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-18.34%

+9.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.58%

32.64%

-16.06%

Volatility

BAM vs. MORN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) is 10.23%, while Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that BAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MORN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMMORNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

13.81%

-3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.52%

30.59%

-8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.85%

34.33%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

30.68%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.23%

27.75%

+2.48%

Dividends

BAM vs. MORN - Dividend Comparison

BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than MORN's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
4.09%3.34%2.80%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MORN
Morningstar, Inc.
1.05%0.84%0.48%0.52%0.66%0.28%0.65%0.74%0.91%0.95%1.20%0.95%

Financials

BAM vs. MORN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Morningstar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.34B
644.80M
(BAM) Total Revenue
(MORN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAM vs. MORN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
63.0%
Portfolio components
BAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MORN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morningstar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 405.90M and revenue of 644.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

BAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MORN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morningstar, Inc. reported an operating income of 900.00K and revenue of 644.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

BAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

MORN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morningstar, Inc. reported a net income of 107.10M and revenue of 644.80M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAM and MORN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MORN has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to BAM (10.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAM dropped -30.37% vs MORN's -67.92%.

BAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAM and MORN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer