PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAM vs. KKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAM vs. KKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -10.42% return, which is significantly higher than KKR's -26.61% return.


BAM

1D
-0.45%
1M
-6.66%
YTD
-10.42%
6M
-11.77%
1Y
-17.14%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10Y*

KKR

1D
-0.20%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-26.61%
6M
-28.16%
1Y
-23.96%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
23.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAM vs. KKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
-10.42%-0.24%39.70%45.61%-10.41%
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
-26.61%-13.32%79.65%80.48%-11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and KKR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.64

The correlation between BAM and KKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAM:

$74.44B

KKR:

$88.94B

EPS

BAM:

$1.55

KKR:

$3.10

PE Ratio

BAM:

29.64

KKR:

30.04

PEG Ratio

BAM:

0.05

KKR:

3.17

PS Ratio

BAM:

14.71

KKR:

4.45

PB Ratio

BAM:

6.63

KKR:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAM:

$5.08B

KKR:

$19.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAM:

$3.26B

KKR:

$8.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAM:

$2.35B

KKR:

$9.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAM vs. KKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM
BAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

KKR
KKR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
KKR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
KKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KKR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM vs. KKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMKKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.54

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-0.99

-0.05

BAM vs. KKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the KKR Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and KKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMKKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-0.65

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

BAM vs. KKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum KKR drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and KKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMKKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-53.10%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-44.62%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.37%

-49.42%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.56%

-43.68%

+19.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-16.18%

+7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.58%

24.21%

-7.63%

Volatility

BAM vs. KKR - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) have volatilities of 10.23% and 10.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMKKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

10.21%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.52%

29.77%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.85%

37.30%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

39.23%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.23%

36.64%

-6.41%

Dividends

BAM vs. KKR - Dividend Comparison

BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than KKR's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
4.09%3.34%2.80%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
0.80%0.57%0.47%0.78%1.31%0.77%1.31%1.71%3.23%3.18%4.16%10.13%

Financials

BAM vs. KKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and KKR & Co. Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.34B
4.00B
(BAM) Total Revenue
(KKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAM vs. KKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and KKR & Co. Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
99.5%
Portfolio components
BAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.98B and revenue of 4.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.5%.

BAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

KKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported an operating income of 205.35M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

BAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

KKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a net income of 405.23M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAM and KKR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAM has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to KKR (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAM dropped -30.37% vs KKR's -53.10%.

BAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAM and KKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer