BAH vs. PLD
BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) and PLD (Prologis, Inc.) are both stocks. BAH operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while PLD operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, BAH returned 12.42%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for PLD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAH vs. PLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 12.42%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.
BAH
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- 1Y
- -21.36%
- 3Y*
- -6.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
PLD
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 35.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
BAH vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -5.36% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | -1.04% | 24.46% | 60.16% | 20.21% | 7.77% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 12.74% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and PLD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BAH and PLD has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BAH:
$9.57B
PLD:
$136.72B
BAH:
$6.91
PLD:
$3.88
BAH:
11.47
PLD:
36.76
BAH:
0.87
PLD:
15.27
BAH:
8.66
PLD:
2.56
BAH:
$11.22B
PLD:
$8.95B
BAH:
$4.99B
PLD:
$3.88B
BAH:
$1.11B
PLD:
$7.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAH vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank
BAH
PLD
BAH vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAH | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.30 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 3.75 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 12.35 | -13.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAH | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 1.70 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.22 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.33 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
BAH vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -60.24%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and PLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAH | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.24% | -84.70% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.07% | -9.59% | -27.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.24% | -31.37% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.24% | -43.30% | -16.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.24% | -43.30% | -16.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.99% | -6.67% | -49.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -17.36% | +6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 2.91% | +19.52% |
Volatility
BAH vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Prologis, Inc. (PLD) at 5.54%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAH | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 5.54% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.28% | 14.18% | +17.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.83% | 21.22% | +16.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.01% | 26.95% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 26.98% | +1.69% |
Dividends
BAH vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PLD's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 2.83% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.87% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
BAH vs. PLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAH vs. PLD - Profitability Comparison
BAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.00M and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
BAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 263.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
BAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAH and PLD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAH has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to PLD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -60.24% vs PLD's -84.70%.
PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAH and PLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer